Cheese Slave

For the love of cheese

Sick baby December 12, 2007

Filed under: baby food, cold — cheeseslave @ 9:30 pm

Kate was a little under the weather today. She doesn’t have a full-on cold but she was cranky and out of sorts all day. The slightest thing would make her cry and all day long she wanted to be held and carried. Normally she is so energetic and easy-going and happy — and wanting to be crawling and exploring.

She’s in bed now but she’s woken up a few times since Daddy put her down. She wakes up and fusses for a few minutes, then goes back to sleep. I went in once and rocked her back to sleep — but I think it’s better if I can stay out. She seems to go back to sleep more quickly if I don’t go in.

It’s hard though because I want to comfort her. Poor little sweetheart. I carried her around on my hip all day, and she had 3 naps instead of her usual 2.

If she’s still fussing later, maybe she’ll sleep in our bed tonight.

I did feed her well today. As usual. I’m sure the good nutrition will help her fight whatever is ailing her.

This is what she ate:

Breakfast:
Cod liver oil
Pears
Breast milk & raw milk formula

Lunch:
Turkey stock
Zucchini with X factor butter oil and sea salt
Breast milk & raw milk formula

Snack:
Raw milk formula

Dinner:
More cod liver oil (I gave her extra today)
Turkey stock (leftover from lunch)
Zucchini with X factor butter oil and sea salt (leftover from lunch)
Soft-boiled egg yolk with grated raw liver and sea salt
Papaya (for dessert!)
Raw milk formula

 

Gelée, or jellied stock December 12, 2007

Filed under: aspic, baby food, books, gelee, julia child, mastering the art of french cooking, recipes — cheeseslave @ 9:08 pm

Okay, so just to clarify: according to Julia, aspic is the jellied stock that contains various items such as eggs and meat and vegetables. It’s a kind of composed salad.

Gelée is the jellified stock that you make aspic with.

Here’s what Julia says (in Mastering the Art of French Cooking) about gelée, or “homemade jellied stock”:

Calf’s feet and veal knuckles contain enough natural gelatin to make a stock jell by itself; pork rind helps the process. They are added to simmer with any of the stocks on pages 107 to 100 and will provide about 3 quarts of jelly.

Use either 2 calf’s feet OR 1 pound cracked veal knuckles AND 1/4 pound fresh or salt pork rind.

What is pork rind? I don’t even know! Ah, it is the skin of a pig. Thank you, Wikipedia.

OK, she says you can also use commercial gelatin… which I think I will do to start. I don’t happen to have a good source right at the moment for veal knuckles and pig skin. However, I do happen to have a whole cannister of powdered gelatin because I use it in Kate’s homemade baby formula (gelatin helps babies digest cow’s milk).

Julia says:

One envelope of powdered American gelatin (1/4 ounce) is the equivalent of 4 sheets of French gelatin.

How to Use Powdered Gelatin:
Sprinkle 1 envelope of powdered gelatin into 1/4 to 1/2 cup of cold stock and let it soften for 3 to 4 minutes. Then blend it into the rest of the stock (use 1 envelope per 2 cups of stock) and stir over moderate heat for several minutes until the gelatin has completely dissolved and the liquid is absolutely free of granules.

How to Use Sheet Gelatin:
If you are living in France (hello, Louisa!), you will usually buy gelatin in sheets. Soak the sheets in cold water for about 10 minutes, until they are soft. Drain them, then stir them in the stock over gentle heat until the gelatin has completely dissolved.

Julia says you can add wine flavoring (port, Madeira, or cognac). We won’t be doing that since we are making baby food.

She also says it is imperative that you test your jelly:

Testing Jellies
Always test out a jelly before using it; the few minutes you spend can save you from disaster. Pour 1/2 inch of jelly into a chilled saucer and refrigerate it for about 10 minutes until it has set. Then break it up with a fork and let it sit at room temperature for 10 minutes. For aspics its broken lumps should stand alone, but not be rubbery. If the jelly is too hard, add unjellied stock and test again. If the jelly is too soft, add more gelatin and test again.

 

Does eating red meat cause cancer? December 12, 2007

Filed under: cancer, microwave, red meat, soy, studies — cheeseslave @ 8:26 am

A new study from the National Cancer Institute is proclaiming that eating red meat causes cancer.

This kind of study really bugs me. The science behind it is so profoundly flawed.

They followed a population and studied their eating habits and then concluded that the people with the highest cancer rates were the people eating the most meat.

They didn’t account for all the other possible factors. Like where the meat came from and how it is cooked.

What is most meat cooked in? What are McDonalds hamburgers cooked in?

VEGETABLE AND SOYBEAN OIL!

http://www.mcdonalds.com/app_controller.nutrition.categories.ingredients.index.html

And read this, from a web page promoting soy to ward off cancer (http://www.cancercenter.com/after-care-services/soy.cfm):

Soy Oil is the natural oil extracted from the soybean. It is the most frequently consumed oil in the United States and accounts for nearly 75 percent of our total vegetable oil intake, mostly through processed food products like mayonnaise, coffee creamers, margarines, sandwich spreads and salad dressings. Oil sold in the grocery store under the generic name “vegetable oil” is usually 100 percent soy oil.

Soy oil is in everything! From ketchup to baby formula. Most restaurants use vegetable (soy) oil for all their frying and grilling.

So how can these scientists deduce that meat was the culprit?

These scientists assumed that it was barbecuing and frying meat that causes the problem:

Grilling meat over a direct flame results in fat or meat juices dripping onto the hot fire. That creates flames that contain the harmful compounds, which can then adhere to the surface of the food. That process can happen with chicken and turkey as well as red meat.

“That’s why we recommend if you’re barbecuing, take particularly chicken, for example, you may want to microwave it halfway cooked, and then put it on barbecue,” Curran said. “You don’t want to cook it the whole duration, because that really increases the risk of these compounds forming, which are known carcinogens.”

(http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17122667)

MICROWAVE? Ugh! Has anyone studied the health risks associated with using a microwave too cook your food?

Yes, in fact, someone has. A lot of people have. Including Dr. Bernard Blanc, a Swiss scientist actually tested people’s blood after they consumed food cooked in a microwave:

Lymphocytes (white blood cells) showed a more distinct short-term decrease following the intake of microwaved food than after the intake of all the other variants.

(http://www.cancersalves.com/articles/Microwave.html)

Oh my goodness! White blood cells. I’m no cancer expert, but don’t those factor in quite a bit when it comes to cancer?

And look at this: http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20041013.htm

This guy says that if you plant a seed in two different pots, and water one with regular tap water and the other with water that has been microwaved, the one with the microwaved water will not sprout. Isn’t that interesting? I want to try it.

Isn’t it also alarming? If microwaved water makes it so a seed will not sprout, what does it do to our bodies?

Let’s think about this for a second… people have been eating red meat for how long? Um, since the caveman days. How long have we had microwaves and soybean oil and processed foods? Just the past 50 years or so. And when did cancer start ravaging the population? Um, the past 50 years or so.

Gosh, it must be the meat eating. WHAT? How can you draw a conclusion like that? It’s absurd.

Plus they admitted that the heavy meat eaters in the study were more likely to smoke cigarettes and were less likely to eat fruits and vegetables.

If the people they studied were all non-smokers and were eating raw meat and no processed foods, then there might be a case. A good study might be to compare those folks to vegetarians who also ate no processed foods and did not use the microwave. But you’d have to severely restrict and monitor what they ate.

But you can’t just look at a population, pick one thing out of all the bad stuff they consume, and say that that is what is causing disease.

Here’s the study if you are interested: http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0040325